La Collection DEUR

Chapman, E., Haby, M.M., Toma, T.S. et al. (2020). Knowledge translation strategies for dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews. Implementation Science, 15(14).
While there is an ample literature on the evaluation of knowledge translation interventions aimed at healthcare providers, managers, and policy-makers, there has been less focus on patients and their informal caregivers. Further, no overview of the literature on dissemination strategies aimed at healthcare users and their caregivers has been conducted. The overview has two specific research questions: (1) to determine the most effective strategies that have been used to disseminate knowledge to healthcare recipients, and (2) to determine the barriers (and facilitators) to dissemination of knowledge to this group.

Dagenais, C. (2018). Policy brief as a knowledge transfer tool: to “make a splash”, your policy brief must first be read. Gaceta Sanitaria, 32(3), p. 203-205.
Preparing these Policy Briefs should always form part of a broader knowledge transfer process. Therefore, they often serve as discussion tools during deliberative workshops. The “neutral” PB provides nuanced information to give an overall picture of the situation of a given problem. The most “interventionist” PB puts forward solutions to a problem and seeks a quick change. It summarizes the results of a study (or several studies) and expresses operational (actionable) recommendations intended for non-specialist audiences with the objective of their making use of them in their professional practices or for policy decision-making”. It is intended for decision-makers and practitioners to whom it provides solutions, which research has allowed to identify, with the objective of improving ongoing practices. It should provide a basis for entering into dialogue with the stakeholders on the relevance and the feasibility of implementing the recommendations. There are still relatively few evidence on the effectiveness of PBs a a knowledge transfer tool. But studies have shown: 1) that decision-makers consider PBs to be a precious communication tool and that they use them in decision-making; 2) senior officials have a preference for “pre-digested” results; and 3) concise documents.

ElShafie, S.J. (2018). Making Science Meaningful for Broad Audiences through Stories. Integrative and Comparative Biology 58(6), p. 1213–1223.
Science is a search for evidence, but science communication must be a search for meaning. General audiences will only care about science if it is presented in a meaningful context. One of the most effective ways to do this is through storytelling. Stories are integral to all cultures. Studies indicate that stories even help audiences to process and recall new information. Scientists sometimes worry that storytelling will conflate empirical evidence with fabrication. But when telling non-fiction stories, it is a process of recognizing the story elements already present in the subject material and distilling the most concise and compelling account for a target audience. In this paper, I review literature, offer examples, and draw from my experience as a scientist and a communication trainer to explore how storytelling makes science comprehensible and meaningful for general audiences.

Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux. (2016). Guides, outils et liens utiles - Transfert des connaissances - Professionnels de la santé - MSSS. Transfert des connaissances - guides, outils et liens utiles.

Voici quelques références utiles concernant des guides, des outils et des sites qui visent à soutenir le transfert des connaissances issues de la recherche et de l’évaluation

INSPQ (2009). Animer un processus de transfert des connaissances BILAN DES CONNAISSANCES ET OUTIL D’ANIMATION. Institut national de santé publique.
Pour soutenir et outiller les acteurs appelés à participer à des processus de transfert des connaissances, le ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (MSSS) et l'Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ) proposent un document simple et complet, qui présente un bilan intégré des écrits et un outil d'animation. Ces deux volets complémentaires fournissent des éléments de réflexion sur lesquels s'appuyer pour systématiser et consolider les pratiques de transfert des connaissances.

Québec en forme (2013). S’investir en transfert DE CONNAISSANCES. Québec en forme.
Ce feuillet s’adresse autant aux acteurs qui travaillent sur le terrain qu’à ceux des milieux producteurs de connaissances (universités, ministères et bureaux régionaux, OSBL, etc.). Il vise à : 
•    Démystifier le transfert de connaissances;
•    En reconnaître la plus-value;
•    En montrer les bénéfices sur le plan pratique et organisationnel.

Santé Canada (2017). Guide de planification de l'application des connaissances. Gouvernement du Canada.
Le Guide de planification de l’application des connaissances (AC) peut vous aider à adopter une approche pratique et fondée sur des données probantes pour la diffusion et la mise en œuvre des connaissances.

Beck, N. (2017). En finir avec les idées reçues sur la vulgarisation scientifique. Quae.
« Vulgariser ? Je n’ai pas de temps à perdre avec ça ! » Voilà l’un des arguments fréquemment avancés par les chercheurs ou doctorants, parfois peu enthousiastes à l'idée de se lancer dans des actions de dialogue ou de partage vers le grand public. En choisissant de traiter une à une ces idées reçues que l’on entend parfois dans les laboratoires, l’auteur propose d’observer la vulgarisation scientifique sous l’angle de ceux qui y sont plutôt réticents et de se pencher, plus sérieusement, sur les questions qui gravitent autour des rapports entre sciences et société. Quels en sont les enjeux ? À quels publics s'adresse-t-on quand on fait de la médiation scientifique ? Est-ce que cela peut avoir un intérêt pour la recherche ? Quels sont les outils de cette communication vers le grand public ?

Cormick, C. (2019). The Science of Communicating Science: The Ultimate Guide. CSIRO.
Are you wishing you knew how to better communicate science, without having to read several hundred academic papers and books on the topic? Luckily Dr Craig Cormick has done this for you! 
This highly readable and entertaining book distills best practice research on science communication into accessible chapters, supported by case studies and examples. With practical advice on everything from messages and metaphors to metrics and ethics, you will learn what the public think about science and why, and how to shape scientific research into a story that will influence beliefs, behaviors and policies. 
Features: Captures the breadth of contemporary research on how to communicate science in plain English Supported by examples and case studies throughout Highly entertaining and informative.

Klein, É. (2020). Le goût du vrai. Gallimard.
Suite à la crise du coronavirus qui a fortement bouleversé le monde, l'auteur, physicien et philosophe, met en évidence une montée du populisme anti-science. Il questionne la place de la science dans la société ainsi que son rapport avec le politique.

Lapointe, P. (2008). Guide de vulgarisation - au-delà de la découverte scientifique, la société. Éditions MultiMondes.
Comment vulgariser? Comment faire en sorte que, pour le lecteur ou le téléspectateur, la science ne soit pas vue comme un corps extraterrestre, mais bien comme une partie intégrante de notre société? Peut-on vulgariser même si on n’a pas étudié en science? Qu’est-ce que les blogues peuvent nous apprendre sur une communication des sciences réussie? Qu’est-ce que la vulgarisation? Comment poser les bonnes questions? Comment rater un texte et comment le réussir? Quelle est la place de la science dans les médias? Internet peut-il changer l’équilibre?

Malavoy, S. (2020). Guide pratique de vulgarisation scientifique (2e éd.). ACFAS.
Ce guide très concret s'adresse à plusieurs publics. Aux étudiant-e-s qui ont à rédiger des travaux efficacement, aux chercheur-se-s qui ont à rendre leurs travaux intelligibles et à toute personne désireuse de communiquer un savoir avec fluidité. Qu’il soit question d’un article, d’un texte court destiné au Web et même d’une présentation orale, l’ouvrage fournit des conseils, toujours illustrés d’exemples, tant sur la manière d’accrocher dès la première ligne que sur celle de conclure avec une chute qui ne laissera pas tomber. 

Michaut, C. (2014). Vulgarisation scientifique, mode d’emploi. EDP Sciences.
Vulgarisation, mode d’emploi est le premier guide de vulgarisation. Il offre des réponses concrètes aux scientifiques et ingénieurs souhaitant partager leurs savoirs avec le plus grand nombre. Véritable manuel pratique, il décrit les règles de base, les pièges à éviter, les différents modes de vulgarisation et de médiation scientifiques, sans oublier les aspects concrets des petits et grands projets de médiation scientifique.

Montgomery, S. L. (2017). The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science (Second éd.). University of Chicago Press.
For more than a decade, The Chicago Guide to Communicating Science has been the go-to reference for anyone who needs to write or speak about their research. Whether a student writing a thesis, a faculty member composing a grant proposal, or a public information officer crafting a press release, Scott Montgomery’s advice is perfectly adaptable to any scientific writer’s needs. 
This new edition has been thoroughly revised to address crucial issues in the changing landscape of scientific communication, with an increased focus on those writers working in corporate settings, government, and nonprofit organizations as well as academia. Half a dozen new chapters tackle the evolving needs and paths of scientific writers. These sections address plagiarism and fraud, writing graduate theses, translating scientific material, communicating science to the public, and the increasing globalization of research. 

Olson, R. (2018). Don't be Such a Scientist: Talking Substance in an Age of Style (2e éd.). Island Press.
The time is right for a new edition of Olson's revolutionary work. In Don't Be Such a Scientist, Second Edition, Olson renews his call for communication that stays true to the facts while tapping into something more primordial, more irrational, and ultimately more human. In more than 50 pages of new material, Olson brings his pioneering message to this new age, providing tools for speaking out in anti-science era and squaring off against members of the scientific establishment who resist needed change.
Don't Be Such a Scientist, Second Edition is a cutting and irreverent manual to making your voice heard in an age of attacks on science. Invaluable for anyone looking to break out of the boxes of academia or research, Olson's writing will inspire readers to "make science human"-and to enjoy the ride along the way.

Roger D. A., Amy L. A. (2019). Championing Science: Communicating Your Ideas to Decision Makers. University of California Press.
Championing Science shows scientists how to persuasively communicate complex scientific ideas to decision makers in government, industry, and education. This comprehensive guide provides real-world strategies to help scientists develop the essential communication, influence, and relationship-building skills needed to motivate nonexperts to understand and support their science. Instruction, interviews, and examples demonstrate how inspiring decision makers to act requires scientists to extract the essence of their work, craft clear messages, simplify visuals, bridge paradigm gaps, and tell compelling narratives. The authors bring these principles to life in the accounts of science champions such as Robert Millikan, Vannevar Bush, scientists at Caltech and MIT, and others. With Championing Science, scientists will learn how to use these vital skills to make an impact.

Van Dam, F., de Bakker, L., Dijkstra, A. M. et Jensen, E. A. (2020). Science Communication: an introduction (vol.1) World Scientific.
The book provides a concise, informative, comprehensive, and current overview of key issues in the field of science communication, the background of science communication, its theoretical bases, and its links to science communication practice. Especially the link between theory / research and practice is very well developed in the book and in the individual chapters. A concise, coherent and easily readable textbook about the field of science communication, connecting the practice of science communicators with theory. In the book, recent trends and shifts in the field resonate, such as the transition from telling about science to interacting with the public and the importance of science communication in health and environmental communication. The chapters have been written by experts in their disciplines, coming from philosophy of science and communication studies to health communication and science journalism. Cases from around the world illustrate science communication in practice. The book provides a broad, up-to-date and coherent introduction to science communication for both, students of science communication and related fields, as well as professionals

Association des communicateurs scientifiques. (2021). Association des communicateurs scientifiques du Québec | ACS. L’Association des communicateurs scientifiques du Québec (ACS) est le regroupement de professionnels de la communication scientifique au Québec. Elle soutient ses membres exerçant dans le milieu journalistique et muséal ainsi que dans le réseau des universités québécoises, les médias, les écoles et les lieux de diffusion scientifique.

Équipe Renard. (2019). Équipe RENARD Recherche sur le transfert de connaissances. RENARD.
L’équipe de recherche en partenariat RENARD œuvre dans ce qu’il est maintenant convenu d’appeler « la science du transfert des connaissances » (TC) dans le domaine des interventions sociales.

Gouvernement du Québec. (2021, 8 septembre). Accueil. Scientifique en chef.